Ready to analyse
Click Load Data to pull the latest C-CAP reviews from Google Sheets.
Cohort Overview
C-CAP Corporate Capstone β Technical and Skill Review summary
Technical Score Distribution
Scores out of 100
Communication Score Distribution
Scores out of 45
Technical Decisions
Delivery Decisions
Student Profiles
Filter, sort, then click any row to expand the full breakdown
Technical Review Analysis
4-category rubric: Analytical Insight Β· Communication Clarity Β· Persuasion & Presence Β· Integration of External Data
Category Score Averages
Average across all 4 categories
Band Rating Distribution
Poor β Excellent breakdown per category
Sub-Criterion Pass Rates (β₯50% of max)
Weakest sub-criteria first Β· red = most students scoring below 50%
Student Γ Sub-Criterion Heatmap
β β₯50% Β· β Below 50% Β· sorted by total score
Skill Review Analysis
Communication clarity, persuasion, presence β 6-slide board pitch delivery
CC vs PP Performance
Communication Clarity vs Persuasion & Presence
Time Management
Distribution of time management ratings
Delivery Checklist Pass Rates β 6 Slides
Hardest items first Β· Yes = full Β· Partial = 0.5
Slide Group Delivery Rates
Which slide is the weakest delivery segment
Skill Mentor Calibration
Avg CC and PP per mentor vs cohort
CC vs PP Quadrant
Delivery profile β Communication vs Presence
Pitch Duration Distribution
How many students stayed within 10 minutes
Delivery Checklist β Yes / Partial / No Breakdown
Full tristate per item across all 24 criteria
Combined View
Technical vs communication performance β matched by OA email or CASL ID
Technical vs Communication Scatter
Each dot = one student Β· Quadrant lines = cohort averages
Score Gap β Technical vs Communication
Students with biggest divergence Β· Blue = tech Β· Teal = comm
All Matched Students
| Student | Tech /100 | AI /35 | Cat2 /25 | Cat3 /20 | Cat4 /20 | Tech Decision | Comm /45 | CC /25 | PP /20 | Delivery Decision | In Time? |
|---|
Exam Readiness
Composite readiness β Technical 50% Β· Checklist 25% Β· Communication 25%
Readiness Threshold
Adjust the minimum % to define "exam ready"
60%readiness threshold
Readiness Distribution
Readiness Breakdown
Student Readiness Table
Sorted lowest first
| Student | Readiness % | Tech /100 | CL /24 | Comm /45 | Status | Action |
|---|
At-Risk Students
Flagged across multiple dimensions β prioritised for intervention
Missing Reviews
Students who have not yet completed both review types
β Tech review only β no skill review yet
| Student | Tech /100 | Tech Decision |
|---|
β Skill review only β no tech review yet
| Student | Comm /45 | Delivery Decision |
|---|
Reviewer Workload
Reviews submitted per reviewer/mentor
Reviewer Intelligence
Click any card to expand full profile β scoring patterns, calibration, feedback quality
β reviewers
Study Plan Recommendations
Auto-generated from cohort data β prioritised by urgency
Deep Dive Analytics
Submission timeline Β· Score percentiles Β· Inconsistency detection Β· Coaching patterns
π
Submission Timeline
β± Pitch Duration Distribution
Distribution of actual pitch lengths
π
Score Percentile Table
Each student's rank within the cohort
| Rank | Student | Tech /100 | Tech Pctile | Comm /45 | Comm Pctile | Combined Pctile |
|---|
π Checklist Inconsistency Detector
Rubric score diverges from checklist pass rate
π£ Coaching Note Frequency
Delivery items generating the most coaching notes
Duplicate Records
Students with more than one submission
All Reviews
Complete dataset β searchable